Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugfix/vyata-dhcp-ip-allocation-issues #250

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

myminseok
Copy link

@myminseok myminseok commented Aug 4, 2022

this is the same PR with previous PR that has discarded due to "sign off rule on commit", sorry @carlosonunez-vmw

Hi, @carlosonunez-vmw
this PR address the issues on assigning IP to TKG VMs using the vyos DHCP server.
expected to get IP for each port group from the expected dhcp network on vyos vm. but assigned all IPs from single dhcp-server network. solution is adding vlan on portgroup.

expected:

1) Test VM with portgroup: "tkg_mgmt_pg-192.168.40.1"          should get 192.168.40.200 from vyos DHCP pool "tkg-mgmt-network"
2) Test VM with portgroup: "tkg_workload_pg-192.168.60.1"      should get 192.168.60.200 from vyos DHCP pool tkg-workload-network

actual result

1) Test VM with portgroup: "tkg_mgmt_pg-192.168.40.1"          got 192.168.40.200 from vyos DHCP pool "tkg-mgmt-network"
2) Test VM with portgroup: "tkg_workload_pg-192.168.60.1"      got 192.168.40.201 from vyos DHCP pool tkg-mgmt-network

solution

adding vlan on portgroup

govc host.portgroup.add -vswitch vSwitch0 -vlan=10 "nsx_alb_management_pg-172.16.10.1"
govc host.portgroup.add -vswitch vSwitch0 -vlan=40 "tkg_mgmt_pg-172.16.40.1"
govc host.portgroup.add -vswitch vSwitch0 -vlan=50 "tkg_mgmt_vip_pg-172.16.50.1"
govc host.portgroup.add -vswitch vSwitch0 -vlan=80 "tkg_cluster_vip_pg-172.16.80.1"
govc host.portgroup.add -vswitch vSwitch0 -vlan=70 "tkg_workload_vip_pg-172.16.70.1"
govc host.portgroup.add -vswitch vSwitch0 -vlan=60 "tkg_workload_pg-172.16.60.1"

thank you.

@myminseok myminseok requested review from a team and srinivasme21 as code owners August 4, 2022 13:59
@craigtracey craigtracey requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2022 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants